<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet href="https://riceball.com/wp-content/plugins/pretty-rss-feeds/xslt/pretty-feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: That &#8220;A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers&#8221; Article the Anti-Mask People are Passing Around, and Getting it Wrong	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://riceball.com/2020/07/14/that-a-cluster-randomised-trial-of-cloth-masks-compared-with-medical-masks-in-healthcare-workers-article-the-anti-mask-people-are-passing-around-and-getting-it-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://riceball.com/2020/07/14/that-a-cluster-randomised-trial-of-cloth-masks-compared-with-medical-masks-in-healthcare-workers-article-the-anti-mask-people-are-passing-around-and-getting-it-wrong/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2022 08:58:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John K		</title>
		<link>https://riceball.com/2020/07/14/that-a-cluster-randomised-trial-of-cloth-masks-compared-with-medical-masks-in-healthcare-workers-article-the-anti-mask-people-are-passing-around-and-getting-it-wrong/#comment-354</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2022 08:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://germmeansseed.wordpress.com/?p=2932#comment-354</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One thing I didn&#039;t mention in the article was that I contacted maybe a dozen people on Twitter who were sharing the link. I asked if they&#039;d read the paper. Nobody had read the paper. The only party that was interested in reading it was a small group of physicians from the UK. 

Some people on Reddit had read the paper, and I got some of my ideas from there, but they weren&#039;t going around advocating that others read it -- they seemed to think it was obvious that if there&#039;s an article about the topic, you read it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I didn&#8217;t mention in the article was that I contacted maybe a dozen people on Twitter who were sharing the link. I asked if they&#8217;d read the paper. Nobody had read the paper. The only party that was interested in reading it was a small group of physicians from the UK. </p>
<p>Some people on Reddit had read the paper, and I got some of my ideas from there, but they weren&#8217;t going around advocating that others read it &#8212; they seemed to think it was obvious that if there&#8217;s an article about the topic, you read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John K		</title>
		<link>https://riceball.com/2020/07/14/that-a-cluster-randomised-trial-of-cloth-masks-compared-with-medical-masks-in-healthcare-workers-article-the-anti-mask-people-are-passing-around-and-getting-it-wrong/#comment-355</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2022 08:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://germmeansseed.wordpress.com/?p=2932#comment-355</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One thing I didn&#039;t mention in the article was that I contacted maybe a dozen people on Twitter who were sharing the link. I asked if they&#039;d read the paper. Nobody had read the paper. The only party that was interested in reading it was a small group of physicians from the UK. 

Some people on Reddit had read the paper, and I got some of my ideas from there, but they weren&#039;t going around advocating that others read it -- they seemed to think it was obvious that if there&#039;s an article about the topic, you read it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I didn&#8217;t mention in the article was that I contacted maybe a dozen people on Twitter who were sharing the link. I asked if they&#8217;d read the paper. Nobody had read the paper. The only party that was interested in reading it was a small group of physicians from the UK. </p>
<p>Some people on Reddit had read the paper, and I got some of my ideas from there, but they weren&#8217;t going around advocating that others read it &#8212; they seemed to think it was obvious that if there&#8217;s an article about the topic, you read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
